5 ms·
It is possible that in non-emergency situations, the vast majority of situations, a hospital may deny or change the quality of care based off of your likelihood
by SolaceQuantum 7y ago
It is possible that in non-emergency situations, the vast majority of situations, a hospital may deny or change the quality of care based off of your likelihood of paying it off. No one knows the difference between a "medical" credit score and a normal credit score, but we do know that this special, secret credit score is being used to calculate patient treatment.
- alberth 7y agoWouldn’t the easier solution be to not accept patients without insurance (and low co-pays). And given that it’s now a US requirement to have medical insurance, I’m still struggling to understand what this medical credit score is accomplishing.
- ianai 7y agoThere are laws against denial of service.
- JohnFen 7y agoOnly in life-threatening circumstances.
- nexuist 7y agoWhich is kind of funny: all medical problems are life threatening. The only differentiator is how long it'll take them to kill you.
- 0xffff2 7y agoThat's patently not true. Acne is a medical problem faced by a substantial portion of the population at one time or another. In all but the rarest of cases it is not life threatening.
- nexuist 7y agoFrom the acne Wikipedia page: "There is good evidence to support the idea that acne and associated scarring negatively affect a person's psychological state, worsen mood, lower self-esteem, and are associated with a higher risk of anxiety disorders, depression, and suicidal thoughts."[1] While Acne probably won't kill you, it certainly won't make you happier and could contribute to suicide if left untreated. We are lucky that acne meds are cheap, but there is nothing stopping those companies from shooting up their prices tomorrow. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acne#Prognosis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acne#Prognosis
- unishark 7y agoIn that case depression is the life-threatening ailment, not the acne. Just like pneumonia is the reason you go to the ER, not a common cold on the off-chance it might later become pneumonia. Also by the way, the requirement to provide care to any walk-in patient only applies to ER's, and only until they have stabilized the patient.
- JohnFen 7y agoWell, the requirement is more specific: the hospital must treat you if you are in immediate danger of dying. They only have to treat to enough to stabilize you, though, then their legal responsibility is complete.
- ianai 7y agoI agree with the OP in a stronger spirit. It’s in society’s own best interest to ensure a basic level of quality of life to its members. There are many illnesses out there which can severely, negatively affect a persons life but otherwise aren’t always treated because of mitigating factors. Sleep apnea is a good example. Many can get by without treatment, but eventually complications from it or side effects of it can lead to chronic fatigue/reduced productivity at work, and even lead to death. Back pain can do similar. It’s not life threatening but can lead to reduced work productivity which could contribute to being terminated.
- JohnFen 7y agoYes, I agree as well. I was just describing how things are, not how they should be.
- SolaceQuantum 7y agoMedical insurance only covers treatment from specific medical practitioners, of which an entire hospital may contain a wide array of medical practitioners under and also not under any specific patient's insurance company. Having a routine surgery from a surgeon that is covered can still rack up an intense medical bill from an anesthesiologist who is not covered. Similarly, if the insurance company for any reason disputes a hospital claim for any reason, up to and including disagreeing with the hospital that the issued treatment was appropriate in lieu of a cheaper treatment, the hospital goes to the patient to foot the bill. So it is entirely possible to be fully insured and still be forced into unpayable medical debt through factors completely outside of one's control.
- elliekelly 7y ago> So it is entirely possible to be fully insured and still be forced into unpayable medical debt through factors completely outside of one's control. It's frustrating to me that this point is very often overlooked in the discussions about health insurance in the US. A lot of people who go bankrupt over medical bills are fully insured and suffer for reasons entirely beyond their control like the hospital an ambulance decides to route them to when they're unconscious.
- jotm 7y agoWhich sometimes makes me wonder, why pay for insurance at all? Sure sounds like a racket, "pay us and you may get into medical debt, don't pay us and we'll make sure that you do"
- SolaceQuantum 7y agoPrecisely because "pay us and you may get into medical debt, don't pay us and we'll make sure that you do".
- gnopgnip 7y agoThis depends on the state. Many states have passed surprise billing laws, and limit what an out of network provider can charge
- ceejayoz 7y agoIt's a requirement to have medical insurance, but the cheaper qualifying plans have enormous deductibles. A Bronze family plan will typically have a $13k deductible. You pay that entire amount out of pocket before insurance kicks in, and it resets annually... so if you're in the hospital December 31 through Jan 1, you might be on the hook for $26k. There's also nightmare scenarios where the hospital is in-network, but the doctor isn't. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-insurance-surprise-billing/bills-from-out-of-network-doctors-rising-at-in-network-hospitals-idUSKCN1V21VS https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-insurance-surprise...
- koolba 7y agoAlso the deductible fiscal year conveniently restarts halfway through flu season.
- gnopgnip 7y agoThis is incomplete. A bronze family plan will typically have a deductible of $6k for an individual, and 13k for the family, but it also has an out of pocket max of slightly over that, so once you meet the deductible that is all you pay. Also almost all bronze plans cover the first 3 doctor visits with a normal copay, and any preventive care has no copay. Gold and above plans typically do not have a deductible, and the out of pocket max is lower. Many states have surprise billing laws to limit what bills you can receive from out of network providers.
- ceejayoz 7y ago> so once you meet the deductible that is all you pay There are a lot of subsidized folks on the Bronze plans with zero ability to pay an unexpected $400 bill, let alone a $13k deductible. They're insured, but only technically. > Also almost all bronze plans cover the first 3 doctor visits with a normal copay, and any preventive care has no copay. Sure, but I'm referring to the sorts of bills that bankrupt people, not an annual physical.
- pkaye 7y agoThe high deductible plans were originally for healthy young individuals with an health savings account to pay for the occasional deductible. These plans could be used as tax free investments if you got lucky. These days families end up getting the high deductible plans because that is all they can afford. And they do it without savings to back it up.
- virtuous_signal 7y ago>And given that it’s now a US requirement to have medical insurance It became a "requirement" in 2014 with Obamacare, but since the repeal of the individual mandate in 2019, there is no financial punishment (except well, the increased possibility of medical bankruptcy) for not having insurance: https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/how-repeal-of-the-individual-mandate-and-expansion-of-loosely-regulated-plans-are-affecting-2019-premiums/ https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/how-repeal-of-t...
- djsumdog 7y agoI'm glad the requirement is gone. I had trouble affording insurance under the marketplace plans when I returned to the US: https://battlepenguin.com/politics/returning-to-america-and-the-unaffordable-care-act/ https://battlepenguin.com/politics/returning-to-america-and-...
- ryandrake 7y agoNit pick, but I think the word you two are looking for is “emergency” rather than “emergent”.
- luma 7y ago"Emergent" is the term used in the trade. Webster has this to say: > “Emergent” properly means “emerging” and normally refers to events that are just beginning—barely noticeable rather than catastrophic. “Emergency” is an adjective as well as a noun, so rather than writing “emergent care,” use the homely “emergency care.”
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- sanderjd 7y agoSince you're nit picking already and because it's a "today I learned" opportunity, parent's usage fits one of the definitions of emergent, the first one here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/emergent https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/emergent.
- ryandrake 7y agoTIL indeed. Must be industry jargon or trade usage as another reply put it. As a lay person I’ve only ever heard it referred to as “emergency services”.
- SolaceQuantum 7y agoI have corrected this, despite some discussion back and forth, for clarity.
- adrr 7y agoStandard Credit scores are more lenient for medical debt. It takes 6 months for unpaid debt to show up and fully removed if paid in full even after it is sent to collections.