4 ms·
SVT-AV1 is faster than x265. https://medium.com/@ewoutterhoeven/av1-is-ready-for-prime-time-svt-av1-beats-x265-and-libvpx-in-quality-bitrate-and-speed-31c196070
by sp332 7y ago
SVT-AV1 is faster than x265. https://medium.com/@ewoutterhoeven/av1-is-ready-for-prime-time-svt-av1-beats-x265-and-libvpx-in-quality-bitrate-and-speed-31c1960703db https://medium.com/@ewoutterhoeven/av1-is-ready-for-prime-ti...
"We have found that the real-world compression/speed trade-offs for AV1 are in fact excellent, and better than HEVC." https://blogs.cisco.com/collaboration/cisco-leap-frogs-h-264-video-collaboration-with-real-time-av1-codec https://blogs.cisco.com/collaboration/cisco-leap-frogs-h-264... Discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20291344 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20291344
- kabes 7y agoNo it's not. It compares it only to x265 veryslow. A fair comparison would be to test every x265 mode against every av1 mode, x265 is still faster for same quality in for example slow mode. Even then you can only talk about faster for a certain use case. E.g the article starts about video conferencing, that is typically a special mode where you only do 1 pass and disable a lot of optimizations to meet latency requirements. So you can only compare similar modes for a specific use case.
- sp332 7y agox265 is still faster for same quality in for example slow mode Do you have a recent benchmark showing this? Things are changing fast enough that it's hard for me to Google the current state of things.