3 ms·
I'll have to agree with this... but its worth noting that there's a difference between ASP.Net WebForm and ASP.Net MVC. I'm a huge fan of .Net (in fact my star
by vyrotek 16y ago
I'll have to agree with this... but its worth noting that there's a difference between ASP.Net WebForm and ASP.Net MVC.
I'm a huge fan of .Net (in fact my startup runs on it) but I absolutely hate the 'magic' that WebForms does for you.
- noblethrasher 16y agoOf course, you don't have to use the magic of WebForms (as I'm sure you know). You can use it just like 'MVC' where the code-behind class definition is the controller. In fact, now that I think about it, the big difference is that the controller-view mapping is static in WebForms (with code-behind) and dynamic in MVC (method loads a view).
- noonespecial 16y agoToo true. The debacles I've been involved in that caused me to post the above were all hastily constructed WebForm apps at their inception.