3 ms·
1. The relevant distinction is that his employer is a government entity so the First Amendment applies. 2. The issue at hand with the diversity statement is i
by jdkee 7y ago
1. The relevant distinction is that his employer is a government entity so the First Amendment applies.
2. The issue at hand with the diversity statement is it can be construed as compelled speech, violative of the First Amendment.
- gumby 7y agoWell, she says that the university is supporting her free speech rights to publicly object to their policy. And from an ideological point of view I think the first amendment is excessively restricted. Be all that as it may: the university, like any other corporation public and private, has good telelogical reason to pursue this course and what I don't get is that she doesn't acknowledge that. They could be right or wrong overall in implementation but by ignoring that I don't really think she has an argument.