4 ms·
These posts are great and there is always great information in them. But to nitpick, it would be a lot easier to digest on face value if you lead with concurren
by charlesju 7y ago
These posts are great and there is always great information in them. But to nitpick, it would be a lot easier to digest on face value if you lead with concurrency rather than raw total users as that's the true gauge of how your server infrastructure looks like.
- stingraycharles 7y agoYeah I still don’t understand the need to split servers at 10 users. Even if this is in parallel, it must still mean there is a well-beyond-average resource consumption per user.
- cwingrav 7y agoProbably so when your 10 users grow to 1000, your efforts at 10x are good for 1000x, and you’re working on 100000x.