3 ms·
I think it has more to do with one's definition of "doing fine". Boeing lost money. They can continue as a going concern since their 150k employees have a ton o
by unishark 7y ago
I think it has more to do with one's definition of "doing fine". Boeing lost money. They can continue as a going concern since their 150k employees have a ton of other things going on that investors expect to make money, aside from one particular flawed product.
It seems wrong to me to require punishment to scale with the size of the company, as opposed to the size of the "wrong doing". If Boeing has ten other subsidiaries doing defense contracts, satellites and whatever else, that should require them to be fined ten times more?