Having, gaining, and increasing investment builds wealth. My largest point is projecting a binary grouping like "have" and "have nots", which is typically used

Having, gaining, and increasing investment builds wealth. My largest point is projecting a binary grouping like "have" and "have nots", which is typically used to delineate the poor and the not-poor is disingenuous. The poor (have-nots) are not even in the arena. A majority of people in the world today do not have and will not have any investments of any kind ever; those are the have-nots. A more honest statement would be that the wealthiest investors would gain more power over less wealthy investors; however, that is already the case, the wealthiest non-institutional investors are free to create their own hedge funds, an extraordinary overhead - but one some take on, to gain a leg up on the little (rich) guy.