One problem is determining truth. The person enforcing the rules like this is not objective and does not know everything. Lets say Politician A implies somethi

One problem is determining truth. The person enforcing the rules like this is not objective and does not know everything. Lets say Politician A implies something without explicitly stating it. If Politician B said that A said what he only implied is B then lying? What happens if A then says B is lying about him saying it. Is A lying when he said he didn't say it? Is B lying when he said A said something? I am extremely dubious stuff like this could actually be done objectively. Sometimes A would be accused of lying and sometimes B would be. The rules would not be applied fairly and equally.