3 ms·
I agree, I was wondering what kind of incentives governments could create to motivate parents to stay together... The current systems are not just suboptimal,
by tomp 7y ago
I agree, I was wondering what kind of incentives governments could create to motivate parents to stay together...
The current systems are not just suboptimal, but actively harmful - they make parents enemies, in case of divorce often one "wins" and the other "loses" (depending on the legal system, either the higher-earning parent wins by not really having to pay any child support, or the lower-earning parent wins by earning huge child support + alimony on top). A better system would penalize both parents, thus motivate them to cooperate to maintain the family unit.
The other issue is, this would have to be balanced out by the fact that sometimes, it's likely better for parents to split/divorce... obviously in case one of them is violent, but even in other cases, they might just not be a good fit, in terms of interests, lifestyle, personality, ... and splitting gives each of them the opportunity to find someone better fitting, and lead happier lives (which should likely carry over to a more positive influence on their kids).
I think shared custody by default does part of this, it keeps both parents in the kids' lives.
Edit: I'm not a lawyer, so my comment "depending on the legal system" above is only based on anecdotal evidence from friends and/or media... the "not having to pay child support" is an example from Slovenia, the "huge child support + alimony" is based on some examples from the US.
- socialdemocrat 7y agoYou must be describing the American system. That does not sound like Norway.