> I don't think it is Mozilla's job to check the morals of developers unless there is a direct risk for users. This seems like something that should apply to i

> I don't think it is Mozilla's job to check the morals of developers unless there is a direct risk for users. This seems like something that should apply to inclusion in the add-on site, NOT to inclusion as an explicitly "recommended" add-on. Recommended add-ons should, in my mind, be recommended for some actual reason beyond "is not malicious"