3 ms·
Note that despite the origin of the link the book seems to use SML/NJ, not MLTon.
by mhd 7y ago
Note that despite the origin of the link the book seems to use SML/NJ, not MLTon.
- brudgers 7y agoNothing against MLTon, but SML/NJ seems to be in more common use based on my experience with the [SML] tag on StackOverflow.
- mhd 7y agoDefinitely. That's why I got excited and thought that there's something specific about MLTon that's used for systems programming here (the capabilities of the "Standard" MLs vary a bit).
- saityi 7y agoI like to use SML/NJ for development and experimentation, and MLton for final compilation. SML/NJ is a really nice development environment, and using a different compiler like MLton or Poly/ML for the final compilation forces you to use the more common, standard subset of ML rather than implementation-specific features.