>You've unfortunately been continuing to post unsubstantive comments, flamebait I'm replying to someone calling Donald Trump's wealth "shaky ground". How is t

>You've unfortunately been continuing to post unsubstantive comments, flamebait I'm replying to someone calling Donald Trump's wealth "shaky ground". How is the original comment not the "flamebait" here? This is the second time you've used the word "unsubstantive" to refer to a comment I make, yet I don't see it in the guidelines. I can't for the life of me understand how calling Donald Trump "poor" (obviously wrong) is substantive, but calling him "not poor" is unsubstantive and flamebait? >personal swipes to HN I don't believe this is true upon perusal of my comment history, which is pretty benign. >have to ban you again It's become clear that some opinions are not tolerated by the userbase, so this is not surprising.