3 ms·
You're right. Apologies. But surely I would get rightfully warned if I'd suggest that the US Army is a great example of successful Stalinism and link to my favo
by jahaja 7y ago
You're right. Apologies. But surely I would get rightfully warned if I'd suggest that the US Army is a great example of successful Stalinism and link to my favourite commissar confirming my articulate trolling?
- dang 7y agoI'm not sure I understand the question, but for sure we don't care whether the comments that break the site guidelines are for or against any particular side. I'd never claim we do a perfect job of being unbiased, because most bias is unconscious, but what I can say is (a) we have many years of conscious practice at it, which must count for something, and (b) most of the time when people interpret moderation as picking on their side, it's a mechanical response (similar to how sports fans feel the refs pick on their favorites) that's not grounded in what we actually do, and doesn't see the cases where the 'other side' got moderated the same way. Does that make sense?