5 ms·
I love the SAP UI - yea, its the 90's when UI was far superior than today's whitespace filled, shadow-less buttons, complete lack of skeumorphic elements, magen
by spectramax 7y ago
I love the SAP UI - yea, its the 90's when UI was far superior than today's whitespace filled, shadow-less buttons, complete lack of skeumorphic elements, magenta gradients and huge typography - See Windows 95 UI: https://twitter.com/tuomassalo/status/978717292023500805 https://twitter.com/tuomassalo/status/978717292023500805
It is dense, extremely clear and consice. I agree with the slowness though.
- meddlepal 7y agoI feel like there continues to be a huge disconnect between UI designers and their users. I'm a power user so I am not the best person to ask for UX advice, but I talk to people all the time that just wish they still had the classic Windows 9x UI's and things more or less were "boring". Reminds me a little bit of a statement about how Taxi drivers can tell you what works architecturally better than an actual architect when it comes to ground floor interaction.
- spectramax 7y agoThat's because contemporary designers are obsessed with trends, frameworks and aesthetics. When Dieter Rams designed Braun products, he didn't have a UI framework. He deeply thought about interaction and feedback to the user. Contemporary UI trends bother me except one: websites like drewdevault.com and text.npr.com are refreshing.
- cm2187 7y agoThat’s the problem with software. There are two categories of software: software that their developers use themselves, and software made for other people. Visual Studio is the prime example of a software made by people who use it, it continuously improves (minus a few hiccups), it is made for the most used functionalities to be at your fingertips, it doesn’t hide stuff in layers of submenus, etc. The list is long of software made for others, and the general rule is “fuck it, good enough”. This is also why I believe the Windows 8/10 developers must be working on macs.
- reportgunner 7y agoI agree with your comment except Visual Studio part. Everytime I use Visual Studio it feels like I'm using a big pile of hacks of varying age.
- 72deluxe 7y agoWhat language do you write in using Visual Studio? I use it with C++ and C# and I can't say stress enough how amazing it is to use with C++, compared to the teeth-pulling experience of using xcode for the same tasks (some of which are impossible in xcode, edit-and-continue for example, set next statement).
- reportgunner 7y agoIt might be just me, I use Visual Studio to write C# (not my "first" language) plugins for an older (non C# core) tool. Sometimes I also use Visual Studio to manage SSIS ETL packages, but I need an older VS version because they are not always backwards compatible - this leaves me with three versions installed on my computer - 2015,2017 and 2019 - each for something else. To be honest what I don't like is the neverending march of tiled frames for everything - the whole program is one frame, then i have one frame for the code, one frame for the solution explorer, two more frames for error list and output, another one for properties and so on. A lot of screen space is taken by just blank spaces or dividers. Another thing that I didn't like was that the 'Comment selection' option is hidden in Edit -> Advanced -> Comment selection. You also have to use two keyboard shortcuts in succession to comment something (Ctrl+K, Ctrl+C) and the uncomment shortcut is different (Ctrl+K, Ctrl+U). All this while Ctrl + / does nothing and could do both at the same time. I often need the whole VS solution and not just the code when I need to copy paste the project to a different folder or a different machine.
- 72deluxe 7y agoHave you tried moving the frames around a bit? I normally dump all the frames down the bottom particularly for debugging. The double-keystroke thing is a bit odd yes, and the menu is hidden a bit far away for ease of navigation. Still, it could be worse - it could be a RIBBON!
- samplatt 7y agoSAP suffers from the same issue as all other universally-malleable systems: at best, they're only as good as the designer allows them to be. However, just because it resembles 90's UI (which I'm a massive fan of) doesn't mean it follows it philosophically. It regularly breaks its own rules and is deliberately designed to be obscure as possible.
- spectramax 7y ago> “just because it resembles 90’s UI?” I wasn’t talking about mere resemblance. I’m talking about functionality, density of information, layout, hierarchy of importance exemplified by various aspects of the UI, clarity and intent, feedback and signaling, on and on. The whole thing. The only thing that bothered me about SAP was how clunky it felt, simply because it was slow. I’ll quote myself: “It is dense, extremely clear and consice.”, yep it’s great to use. I also love JMP statistical software UI and Cinema4D UI. They’re a pleasure to use.
- fivre 7y agoThe UI /elements/ of the 90s were fine. That doesn't mean that anyone will necessarily build a good UI using them. SAP and software designed to offer high levels of customization in general leave the task of building a complete UI to middle managers familiar with business processes. They do not generally have any understanding of UI design and are quite happy to add a 50x50px, non-resizable text box for content that will often span multiple paragraphs.