3 ms·
Wait until WebAssembly hits the scene in a big way. Browser support is already in-place, now it's on to adoption. When you have binaries running in the browse
by eternalny1 7y ago
Wait until WebAssembly hits the scene in a big way.
Browser support is already in-place, now it's on to adoption.
When you have binaries running in the browser it's going to be a lot harder to block advertisements.
- tryptophan 7y agofrom what I understand, webasm is not practically any different than minified JS in terms of readability. That ship has long ago sailed. WebGL is the real risk I think. You can't filter a canvas with the same ease(if at all} you can filter DOM model elements.
- M2Ys4U 7y agoYou don't need WebGL, blitting pixels to a <canvas> does the trick just fine
- zurn 7y agoJavascript has eval(), it's a much better target for obfuscated code than the trivially disassembled wasm format.