3 ms·
Certainly more quantitatively scruitable than any human system. A human can tell you a more or less convincing narrative about why they did something, but you
by AndrewKemendo 7y ago
Certainly more quantitatively scruitable than any human system.
A human can tell you a more or less convincing narrative about why they did something, but you have fewer independent and objective ways to measure that than you do basically any conceivable computing system.
- gigicontra 7y agoYes sure, but the data and interpretation might be meaningless when explained back to humans, it's like a an intellectual showing off with terms and formulas: "the algorithm did this because ..." followed by a debatable and unintelligible formula + data + stats that nobody would really understand and a new science needs to be invented to understand and so on