5 ms·
Firefox preview is really great. Performance is much, much better than the regular Firefox for Android. Now that it supports the most important extensions, ther
by joelthelion 7y ago
Firefox preview is really great. Performance is much, much better than the regular Firefox for Android. Now that it supports the most important extensions, there's really no reason not to switch.
- nicoburns 7y agoIndeed, this (ublock) is what I've been waiting for to switch. I'm definitely going to give it at least a proper go.
- skrowl 7y agoI need Nano Adblock, Nano Defender, TamperMonkey, and BitWarden. Did they give a list of when / which addons?
- icebraining 7y agoThey say all "recommend extensions" should be working by the first half of 2020; I think these are it: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/search/?recommended=true&sort=random&type=extension https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/search/?recommended...
- dTal 7y agoFenix (Firefox Preview) is not currently free software, as it contains proprietary Google libraries like com.google.android.gms and com.google.firebase. F-Droid currently maintain the Google-free fork of Firefox that is available on F-Droid, but they have said they lack the resources to do the same for Fenix as well. Until this is resolved, there is an excellent reason not to switch. https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/162#issuecomment-575199313 https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/issues/162#issuecomm...
- craftyguy 7y agoAgreed. For an organization that preaches "privacy", Mozilla still continues to make stupid decisions about including google crap everywhere.
- dependenttypes 7y agoThere was a post a while ago about Firefox being the browser that calls home the most. I am unsure if Mozilla cared about privacy in a long time really.
- SquishyPanda23 7y agoHere's a talk about some of the privacy-preserving telemetry they're working on https://youtube.com/watch?v=w7AHAq-mU-M https://youtube.com/watch?v=w7AHAq-mU-M
- craftyguy 7y agoIt's literally the 2nd sentence on firefox.com: > Automatic privacy is here. They "care" about it, but they don't care about it.
- staticassertion 7y agoSorry, what's the excellent reason?
- craftyguy 7y agoIt's not free software, it includes proprietary google tracking libraries.
- staticassertion 7y agoOh, yeah I'm OK with Firefox including some blobs from the platform provider.
- heavyset_go 7y agoSome people use LineageOS and others, and don't install platform libraries that are proprietary, so this information is more relevant to them and not so much to you.
- staticassertion 7y agoMakes sense for sure.
- craftyguy 7y agoThat doesn't mean everyone is OK with it. Some of us place a high value on free software and privacy.
- GeorgeWBasic 7y agoIf you're okay with Google tracking libraries, why not just use Chrome instead?
- elaus 7y agoBecause that's a huge difference in regards of "tracking".
- muizelaar 7y agoHow is this different from linking against Direct3D on Windows?
- dTal 7y agoBecause a) it's uneccesary and b) the proprietary libraries are in the app, unlike Direct3D where you could theoretically run the program without the proprietary libs (eg in Wine).
- xwowsersx 7y agoAgreed, it is very very good. I haven't used it as my default yet, but regularly switch to it especially when I need to read an article with reader view. It's kind of crazy how a lot of writing on the web is made so unreadable due to ads and poor design choices.
- bscphil 7y agoPersonally, I've found the browser engine performance to be barely faster (within the margin of error, certainly), but more importantly the browser chrome is now horribly slow. Opening menus and stuff like that seems to take much longer than before.
- iggldiggl 7y agoAnd as is the nature with such rewrites, it is still missing quite a few little (or sometimes not so little) features that the current Firefox gained over the years...
- coldpie 7y ago> Now that it supports the most important extensions I'm cautiously optimistic. Do you know if NoScript works?