4 ms·
Between the absence of WMDs (I'd never believed they were there) and the disinterest in stabilizing the country after the invasion, it became clear that the goa
by MockObject 7y ago
Between the absence of WMDs (I'd never believed they were there) and the disinterest in stabilizing the country after the invasion, it became clear that the goal was to destroy a nation that had the recent history and continued potential to be a threat to our interests and allies in the region.
- toyg 7y ago... ironically ending up bolstering an already-active adversary in the region, Iran, by removing its “natural predator”. Foreign-policy circles are full of people who think they are the smartest guys in the room, when they are anything but. Dr.Strangelove is alive and well.
- MockObject 7y agoThat's correct! On the other hand, I remember Scott Ritter predicting that 2003 would bring an invasion of Iran as well, so the extended remix of the plan was supposed to handle Tehran, too.
- Gibbon1 7y agoAfter the invasion of Iraq US Army was barely able to keep their supply lines open and that was without the Iranians being overtly hostile. It's no wonder they weren't able to even consider invading Iran.