3 ms·
I think `|>` would actually be `&` in Haskell, it takes a value and a function. `(&) :: a -> (a -> b) -> b` https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.12.0.0/
by ajuhasz 7y ago
I think `|>` would actually be `&` in Haskell, it takes a value and a function.
`(&) :: a -> (a -> b) -> b`
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.12.0.0/docs/Data-Function.html#v:-38- https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.12.0.0/docs/Data-...