4 ms·
You're supporting my point. If a staffer worked for a campaign and in a role in charge of election integrity at the same time, as this firm is doing, it would i
by freewilly1040 7y ago
You're supporting my point. If a staffer worked for a campaign and in a role in charge of election integrity at the same time, as this firm is doing, it would indeed be considered a conflict of interest.
- kelnos 7y agoI think the parent's point is that if you only consider contractors/staffers who don't have conflicts of interest of this sort, your hiring pool drops to a number that is too small to be useful. Whether or not that's true is debatable, but I think it's a compelling point.
- mattrp 7y ago>your hiring pool drops to a number that is too small to be useful. That's why it's called a swamp.