4 ms·
Ah, good point on why we should look at employment vs. unemployment. Makes sense. I was tempted to argue that the decline in construction doesn't support the
by ctkrohn 16y ago
Ah, good point on why we should look at employment vs. unemployment. Makes sense.
I was tempted to argue that the decline in construction doesn't support the "obsolete jobs" hypothesis, because the jobs were created by an overheated housing market and shouldn't have been there in the first place. But regardless of whether the jobs were justified in the first place, they're not coming back. A technological shift isn't the only thing that can make a job obsolete; a one-time speculative bubble can do the same thing.
- yummyfajitas 16y agoNo, you are quite right. The decline in construction jobs doesn't support the "jobs obsolete due to technology" hypothesis. It supports the recalculation hypothesis, but that's a separate issue. It's the increase in production combined with the lack of increase in employment that is evidence in favor of technology making jobs obsolete.