4 ms·
I’m just guessing it was a combination of (1) an app could be distributed / authorized to only specific email addresses, so far less chance of interruption than
by GarrisonPrime 7y ago
I’m just guessing it was a combination of (1) an app could be distributed / authorized to only specific email addresses, so far less chance of interruption than you’d get if the website got leaked to the public, and (2) wanting to simplify the reporting logistics by just having people use their private phones, rather than having to set up laptops and internet, and possibly (3) an attempt to stick a toe into the realm of widespread voting by app.
Of course there’s always the possibility it’s a simple matter of (4) someone lobbying politicians into giving money to his brother to slap together an app, because government money.
- inkeddeveloper 7y agoI suspect a strong sense of 4.
- CWuestefeld 7y agoIt's not government money. This is a party function, and the parties are private organizations, not official parts of the government. (That said, I don't understand why the cost of primaries and, presumably, these caucus events, fall on local taxpayers.)