>For counting things, it seems like computers would be a good fit. You could keep the computers but you also have the papers sealed in boxes. Then you can manu

>For counting things, it seems like computers would be a good fit. You could keep the computers but you also have the papers sealed in boxes. Then you can manually check 1-5% of the votes and make sure the machines are correct. Or if someone contests the count and a judge decides the reasons are fair you can count again all the votes in that polling station.