3 ms·
> I have spend at least 15 hours trying to self host things with docker That only says you haven't spent enough time. Say, 15 hours would be just enough to und
by esjeon 7y ago
> I have spend at least 15 hours trying to self host things with docker
That only says you haven't spent enough time. Say, 15 hours would be just enough to understand postgres container and figure out the best working configuration for you. Apps on top of it? Good luck spending extra 30 hours.
The thing is docker has never claimed that you don't need to learn about the software you're gonna run. It simplifies only deployment (a.k.a. installing and executing binaries) by providing uniform environment, and by making configuration files more reproducible, but it never reduced the complexity of software configuration.
But that doesn't mean Docker isn't a viable option for simplified server-application deployment. All we need is a set of well maintained recipes. It's just that there are too many recipes out there, unreviewed, untested, unmaintained. If one central party takes the responsibility here, Docker (or any other container solution) can outshoot Sandstrom in no time in terms of both quality and quantity.
- brnt 7y agoI'm afraid you're missing the people Sandstorm is targeted at. People who do want a server, and a variety of services on that server, and the ability to move the server to a hoster or local metal, but have no desire, and thanks to Sandstorm no need, to acquire the skills you are referring to. People for which a server is in support of their workflows, not a goal in itself. You're right, a Dockerized alternative might be as good or better. But until such a platform exists (I do not count Cloudron because it's closed source now), it is not viable for the people Sandstorm is targeting.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]