4 ms·
>Again, it's taxes vs private money. That's the entire point of the article, the author is not "confusing" them: >The talks cannot just be about public money,
by throwawaylolx 7y ago
>Again, it's taxes vs private money.
That's the entire point of the article, the author is not "confusing" them:
>The talks cannot just be about public money, and should not become a brawl between "net contributors" and "net beneficiaries."
- luckylion 7y ago> That's the entire point of the article, the author is not "confusing" them I very much believe they are intentionally confusing them because it makes their point. In a "that's basically the same, don't look too hard, just listen to these huge numbers" kind of way.