4 ms·
I'm probably missing something, but isn't it simpler to just make both available separately and allow users to still reference by sha1, if they want to, while s
by ascar 7y ago
I'm probably missing something, but isn't it simpler to just make both available separately and allow users to still reference by sha1, if they want to, while sha256 can be used for collision detection by git operations internally?
- patrec 7y agoCorrect, and I think this is what they are doing -- you can optionally keep the sha1s around.