3 ms·
No, they really are not. Incrementlisim is a very old social manipulation tool. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_0x6oaDmI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_
by jakeogh 7y ago
No, they really are not. Incrementlisim is a very old social manipulation tool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_0x6oaDmI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_0x6oaDmI
- CivBase 7y agoNot sure I buy the slippery slope here. Should we also stop using computers in cars and planes? What about stocks and payment systems? Election results should be backed by multiple, independent records including (but not limited to) a paper trail. Those records should be thoroughly audited for accuracy and consistency. It's perfectly fine to use computers as a quick-and-easy record as long as it's backed by more robust solutions. Everyone talks about electronic voting vs paper as though it has to be one or the other. It should be both! A strong password is recommended, but it's not a substitute for 2FA. In the same way, a robust, highly-auditable voting record is recommended, but it's not a substitute for redundancy.