>No their UI sucked. One third of the page was occupied by a stupid header you couldn't even reduce or remove with a CSS hack. I hated it. What? I must have mi

>No their UI sucked. One third of the page was occupied by a stupid header you couldn't even reduce or remove with a CSS hack. I hated it. What? I must have missed that because I don't remember seeing it. >Also, the content of the page itself was 1/3 wide, which is ridiculous when one is trying to read a long blog post. Which would be much wider than the actual content on it's main competitor facebook.