The Forbes article misses a few key follow-on questions: 1. How many other "security" firms offer the kind of borderline illegal services that HBGary Federal o

The Forbes article misses a few key follow-on questions: 1. How many other "security" firms offer the kind of borderline illegal services that HBGary Federal offered? HBGary Federal probably isn't alone in any of this, or is it? 2. Has the Chamber of Commerce or Bank of America, or indeed, any other Fortune 500 company or US government agency taken up a "security" firm on this kind of a proposal? If so, how often does this get done? Once you ask those two questions, you have to ask yourself if all the cyberespionage attributed to the People's Republic of China is validly attributed.