This article is not saying success is based on luck. It's not saying long term success is based on luck. It is not saying the hugely successful companies or h

This article is not saying success is based on luck. It's not saying long term success is based on luck. It is not saying the hugely successful companies or hugely successful people are based on luck. It's saying a temporary 'rate of change' on success should not be confused with success. It is saying people should not look when success fluctuates for a company or person. But before or after. It then screws up and says "myth of meritocracy" in the last line which has nothing to do with what they are saying and confuses people.