3 ms·
The thing that makes me believe that the evidence was planted is because is such an easy thing to do and it does a lot more damage, if there were some financial
by simion314 7y ago
The thing that makes me believe that the evidence was planted is because is such an easy thing to do and it does a lot more damage, if there were some financial transcation then there would be some more evidence to corroborate it, if it was some objects or property again there would be a lot more things to corroborate, with porn you just plant a file or a stick and then the you show the jury some disturbing image and you are done, you destroyed the person, lazy and efficient.
The article does not mention it and I would like to know if it is know if this was some files on his laptop, or was in his browser cache or browser history or an USB stick
- zionic 7y ago>I would like to know if it is know if this was some files on his laptop, or was in his browser cache or browser history or an USB stick That kind of stuff will never be released though.
- livueta 7y agoGiven the national security aspect of this case you might be right, but in general a lot of dirty details about the hows and wheres of CP cases comes out eventually in court filings. Exhibit A: "Mad Thad" McMichael / https://imgur.com/a/xr2IH https://imgur.com/a/xr2IH - of "\things\dont click\cp\cp" fame.
- shadowgovt 7y agoIronically, it's the sort of tampering that more "privacy violation" by third-parties could help protect people against. Storing your behavior in the clutches of multiple competing firms with multiple conflicting interests can make it easier to protect one against an attack on reputation that involves modifying one data store. "Your honor, the prosecution claims my client had CP on his hard drive, yet it does not appear in either his Apple backups nor his Google Drive synchronization images..."
- simion314 7y agoIt does not have to be like that, you should be able to find traces in recent played videos opened files, what is ironic is that you have a high visibility person like Epstein that FBI is incompetent to catch for years but for some reasons the people they have reasons to find something the evidence just appears... it just feels this laws are not used to protect children/teens but to punish the ones the government doesn't like.
- shadowgovt 7y agoPossible alternate explanation: Epstein had the resources to pay people to obfuscate the trail of any investigators trying to dig up dirt on him, and $J_RANDOM_CIA_STAFFER does not.