LOL. This is hysterical and brilliant but not aggressive enough: "The fund evaluates the 1000 largest US firms for the ratio of women on the board of directors

LOL. This is hysterical and brilliant but not aggressive enough: "The fund evaluates the 1000 largest US firms for the ratio of women on the board of directors and in executive positions (defined as Sr. VP or higher). Companies ranking in the top 10% in each sector are included in the portfolio, with the caveat that each firm must have at least one woman on its board or as CEO." It should be top 5% or so. Also having a single woman on a board of directors is not aggressive enough. Hopefully the 10% or 5% limit throws out such companies. I see you're doing the shorting yourself. Too bad that's note a purchasable fund.