3 ms·
drawings of children are not CP unless they are of a real person. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
by ouid 7y ago
drawings of children are not CP unless they are of a real person. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Free_Speech_Coalit...
- sillysaurusx 7y agoStyleGAN makes this a bit more complicated. I wonder if AI-generated CP would count as CP. It's fake, but it would look real.
- zionic 7y agoWell that's a new nightmare. Could the government then charge github contributors with production?
- dsfyu404ed 7y agoThey could certainly bring the charges. It'd probably get tossed by a court. Whether it's the first court or the supreme court is the million dollar question.
- lonelappde 7y agoWhy? How is an ML model different from an encrypted or encoded or phitoshoppes CP image? It comes down to whether the jurists decide that your data was built from CP content.
- LeoTinnitus 7y agoIt would get tossed immediately. That's like saying that because someone developed the internet, they're responsible for making it easier to distribute CP. Also it's like saying because you are a gun manufacturer, you're responsible for murder deaths with firearms. Or a rope manufacturer is responsible for suicides.
- LeoTinnitus 7y agoWhile personally I do find it a tad creepy, I'd 100% rather pervs draw it than actually exploit children. It's a solution that too many right wing morons would never be satisfied with.