I feel that overall the interview is a mixed bag. Lovelock is unnecessarily dismissive of some things (e.g. Fridays for Future), understandably dismissive of so

I feel that overall the interview is a mixed bag. Lovelock is unnecessarily dismissive of some things (e.g. Fridays for Future), understandably dismissive of some other things (colonization of Mars), but also right on a few counts. I think it's especially useful to draw attention to the benefits of nuclear power when it comes to combating climate change and pollution more generally. I also agree with his observation that the way we teach science (as separate, independent subjects) is really limiting. This, as a matter of fact, goes for all other subjects.