4 ms·

Assuming that you asking honestly, and not just trying to derail the conversation... Start here: https://skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanc

Assuming that you asking honestly, and not just trying to derail the conversation... Start here: https://skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect-basic.htm https://skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enha... Then proceed to intermediate and advanced. There are a TON of citations for your perusal. After your are done with that, the comments have some additional insights. Have fun. This is quite the rabbit hole to dive into.

chrisco255 7y ago
Skeptical Science is not an academic publication. It's a blog. What was the CO2 ppm in the early Holocene? Why was the early Holocene so much warmer than today in spite of lower CO2 concentrations? Early Holocene Temperature Oscillations Exceed Amplitude of Observed and Projected Warming in Svalbard Lakes https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019GL084384 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/201...
- DennisP 7y ago
  > There are a TON of citations Here's one of them from that page, chosen at random: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5589/m04-044 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5589/m04-044 A blog page linking a bunch of academic papers is as good as a hackernews comment linking a bunch of academic papers. Your linked paper is about arctic temperatures, not global average temperatures.