5 ms·
Maybe those who WFH during this situation will develop some empathy for full-time remote workers ... because for damn sure most of them have none. There are som
by notacoward 7y ago
Maybe those who WFH during this situation will develop some empathy for full-time remote workers ... because for damn sure most of them have none. There are some issues that are obvious and easily addressed, like leaving stakeholders out of a meeting entirely ("couldn't find a room on short notice"). There are others that are hard to notice unless you're subject to them all the time.
* A VPN that's OK for short-term use, but unreliable enough to cause multiple flow disruptions every single day.
* Extremely slow (and often more contentious) document/code reviews because people aren't as comfortable with written communication as ftf.
* Losing every commit race because of the above, and having to spend more time than anyone else handling tricky merges.
* Being in effective listen-only mode in meetings because of constant interruption and side chatter (or not even able to hear if half the participants are loudly eating lunch the entire time).
* IDEs that lose their ability to navigate code because the connection to the cross-referencing engine can't survive high latency. (BTW this is related to having a giant monorepo, which is itself a bit of a remote-hostile choice.)
There are many more. Working from home has its advantages, but doing so in an office-first environment can be frustrating too. Maybe those who experience some of that frustration for a few days will at least stop criticizing others for things that aren't their fault.
- koheripbal 7y agoI think it's going to have the opposite effect. Because everyone isn't unaccustomed to working from home - they are going to be tremendously inefficient, and will later assume that all those WFH employees are also therefor chronically inefficient.