3 ms·
- "journey": check - "humbled, honored": check - complete shutdown < 30 days: check - no context on what, why, and how it happened: check. This is a sour po
by tnolet 7y ago
- "journey": check
- "humbled, honored": check
- complete shutdown < 30 days: check
- no context on what, why, and how it happened: check.
This is a sour post, sorry for that. Startups are hard, no question about that.
But as mentioned elsewhere, this type of posts just adds more damage and unclarity to a situation that is probably pretty dramatic for the founders, customer and employees.
- privateSFacct 7y agoThese are the scammers that would report 4,000 5 star reviews for tiny law firms supposedly handling high end ip matters? It was a total scam set of ratings (they claimed to just use top 5% of firms as well but the “ratings” they claimed users left were garbage) - their transparency might have to be “we were caught making up reviews of attorneys on our site”? Don’t know details but someone could find a bar complaint or lawsuit I think
- smallgovt 7y agoI think it's worth noting that non-company stakeholders like myself are in no way owed an explanation of why this happened. As you alluded to, shutting down a startup is a tremendously stressful experience for founders and management. Their top priority is doing right by their customers, employees, and investors. Doing a proper post mortem for the public, in my opinion, is far down on the priority list, and I'm fine with that.