A statement from Sonatype on this: First, I’d like to address some misinformation. The use of Github itself was never an issue. It was how the original movemen

A statement from Sonatype on this: First, I’d like to address some misinformation. The use of Github itself was never an issue. It was how the original movement of the sources to Github was executed, and why, that created tension. Github is just a tool and it is a better choice for source control, at least in the short term, for several reasons: ... We proposed using Github on the Hudson list, and in short order agreement was reached and the move was initiated. Winston did the infrastructure work last night to push the sources for Hudson over to Github. It was really that Simple. It’s amazing how smoothly things go when you clearly communicate your intentions to all stakeholders. We hope to keep improving the infrastructure for Hudson so if you’re interested please join the Hudson Dev list! http://www.sonatype.com/people/2011/02/hudson-moves-to-github-were-not-forking-around/ http://www.sonatype.com/people/2011/02/hudson-moves-to-githu... This guy seems incapable of making a statement about the Oracle Hudson without taking potshots at it's creators and former leaders.