3 ms·
I thought that nobody gives every pc on their network live IPs because we're out of IPs? Why wouldn't you give everything its own unique IP and then limit acce
by mnutt 16y ago
I thought that nobody gives every pc on their network live IPs because we're out of IPs?
Why wouldn't you give everything its own unique IP and then limit access via firewalls? NAT just makes p2p a huge pain.
- arch_hunter 16y agoI think that he means that he is putting everything on the private IP range: 192.168.* .* .
- boreacrat 16y agoWhich means you'll have to use NAT to control your teapot from the office.
- JonnieCache 16y agoAre you brave enough to put your tea-making facilities in the DMZ? That's laying it on the line, man. Personally I think I would reverse proxy my teapot through nginx, I don't trust a TCP/IP stack embedded in a kitchen appliance. I would like to take this opportunity to direct your attention towards the venerable http://nicecupofteaandasitdown.com http://nicecupofteaandasitdown.com which is both splendid and written by a hacker. I think you can tell when you get to the page with the venn diagram of biscuits.
- oconnore 16y agoThe TCP/IP stack in that NetBSD toaster is >= as secure as your laptop/desktop.
- JonnieCache 16y agoThe hypothetical Hot Beverages As A Service device that exists only in my head doesn't use NetBSD, it uses a custom standalone stack running on a PIC/AVR. So there.