3 ms·
Why? They've made this all available, why is grabbing it all in increase your own convenience (eg offline reading, searching) rude?
by oliwarner 7y ago
Why? They've made this all available, why is grabbing it all in increase your own convenience (eg offline reading, searching) rude?
- fxtentacle 7y agoBecause when you actually read it, you will download 1 article per 30 minutes. If you batch-download all of their content now, you'll create much more peak load and, hence, costs for them.
- faitswulff 7y agoOn the other hand, if you download it all at once you aren't constantly reloading a page when you get back to it and you aren't limited to reading it when you're online. I do see the point you're making, though I think it depends on the author's perspective.
- stevehawk 7y agoso he should seed a torrent instead of a wget command?
- oliwarner 7y agoYou can use --limit-rate=500k if you want to limit the bandwidth you're consuming. And load does not translate to cost for everybody. If you saturate the connection to my VPS, I don't pay more, it just gets slower for everybody in contention. I can spin up mirrors but if I'm offering a free resource like this, I'd be more likely to limit the bandwidth-per-client-IP or just actively let it run slow. They could even limit the bandwith to the subdirectory with... location /download/ { limit_conn addr 1; limit_rate 50k; }
- SomeHacker44 7y agoSo read the wget man page and add settings to your liking: --wait=5000 --random-wait Done...