3 ms·
Concerning your first point, granted I'm not familiar with each internal guidelines, and overall it may very well be what you describe but just to give an examp
by doe88 7y ago
Concerning your first point, granted I'm not familiar with each internal guidelines, and overall it may very well be what you describe but just to give an example that's not totally inconceivable, I routinely observe New Yorker staffers promoting their longform pieces on Fresh Air (NPR).
For your second point, I guess it really depends on what you want, either insularity, or diversity, openness and acknowledgement of great works accomplished elsewhere.
- InitialLastName 7y agoThe New Yorker (owned by Conde Nast, which is effectively 100% text publishing) doesn't really compete with NPR (which is effectively 100% radio publishing). The New Yorker also specializes in long-form written pieces, for which NPR interviews act as a sort of promotional piece. On the other hand, even a deep NYT or Wapo investigative report can probably be covered comprehensively enough for most people in 20 mins.
- doe88 7y agoWhat I was simply trying to express is NYT would greatly enrich their reporting by linking to or mentioning or discuss others great reportings, for instance on this episode about the Aghanistan War Papers [1] it would greatly be valuable to at least have a link to the work of WaPo on the subject which was kind of lead on the matter. [0] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/16/podcasts/the-daily/afghanistan.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/16/podcasts/the-daily/afghan...