4 ms·
Bay area large (not huge) corp dev here. We do. We have like a dozen shared, beefy shell servers (varies, but think ~32 core not too old Xeon, ~256GB RAM, 1G o
by throwaway3neu94 7y ago
Bay area large (not huge) corp dev here.
We do. We have like a dozen shared, beefy shell servers (varies, but think ~32 core not too old Xeon, ~256GB RAM, 1G or 10G stable network that's local to the office, TB's of storage and essentially unlimited on NFS) for devs (and more of the same dedicated for CI/CD).
We need this because the codebases are huge and take hours to build on a laptop (and copying across a home uplink would take forever too).
Homedirs are NFS mounted.
It's more cost efficient than spinning up an AWS/Azure instance for myself, and more limited resource efficient than spinning up a VM in OpenStack (both of which I do when appropriate). And it's very convenient team work wise.
There are (many, some avoidable but hard to fix by now) downsides for sure, but I cannot imagine doing this work solely on a laptop.
- knorker 7y agoAt least one huge Bay Area elephant used to run NFS home dirs for basically all their corp. So do you run fscrypt or LUKS with that? Because NFS was already possible, so what is systemd trying to solve?