4 ms·
> Totally different meaning. If people aren't allowed to express who they are or their beliefs for fear of literally being bricked or kicked in the face [0][1]
by rewq4321 7y ago
> Totally different meaning.
If people aren't allowed to express who they are or their beliefs for fear of literally being bricked or kicked in the face [0][1] then you're banning LGBT people (and obviously "LGBT ideology" too).
[0] https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2019/07/bigots-attacks-pride-march-throwing-bricks-burning-rainbow-flags/ https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2019/07/bigots-attacks-pride-mar...
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-l67aCX0vA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-l67aCX0vA
- nec4b 7y agoI agree with you that if you ban LGBT people your are also probably banning LGBT ideology. But banning LGBT ideology does not mean banning LGBT people. Being a LGBT person does not mean that you automatically subscribe to an LGBT ideology.
- detaro 7y agoThis sounds awfully like "as long as you don't do anything visible you can be LGBT", with "LGBT ideology" being things like "you should be allowed to be recognizably LGBT in public", "you should be allowed to talk about being LGBT", ... At least that's how it usually goes when this argument comes out.