5 ms·
Wow. A bit of a digression here but it appears they actually consider email a valid avenue of legal service? That blows my mind. I don’t even check my work emai
by mokus 7y ago
Wow. A bit of a digression here but it appears they actually consider email a valid avenue of legal service? That blows my mind. I don’t even check my work email every 18 hours, and I haven’t looked through my home email in 3 or 4 years except to find specific messages I knew were coming.
- ikeboy 7y agoDifferent courts have ruled differently on that issue. Note that it's mainly applicable to foreign defendants, and you'd have to show that you can't serve them through other channels. See https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/court-rejects-service-of-process-via-amazon-messaging-noco-v-chang.htm https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2019/05/court-rejects-... for a court finding otherwise on a similar case. If you're running a business, there's different expectations.