3 ms·
I understand that, which is why I said 'Which TypeScript is [unsound], by choice'. Disagree that full type safety would require a lot of runtime checks. That's
by yawaramin 7y ago
I understand that, which is why I said 'Which TypeScript is [unsound], by choice'.
Disagree that full type safety would require a lot of runtime checks. That's not the experience I've had in ReasonML.
- afiori 7y agoReasonML is exactly the kind of backwards incompatible change that would be necessary. You cannot mix reasonML and JavaScript freely together.