> so why would they be right in defining artificial intelligence? Because that's simply how language works. It doesn't really matter if you're "right", what ma

> so why would they be right in defining artificial intelligence? Because that's simply how language works. It doesn't really matter if you're "right", what matters is usage. If most people apply AI to mean "artificial intelligence" in the sense of "intelligent like a human or close to that", then that's the meaning. > What if I were to say that my speaker uses AI algorithms to help understand my voice? Then I would ask why you would think that to be the case, then go over why AI doesn't exist yet and move on.