You know what's really silly? Conflating "event driven vs. threads" with "shared memory vs. non-shared". They're two different things. In fact, "silly" is too c

You know what's really silly? Conflating "event driven vs. threads" with "shared memory vs. non-shared". They're two different things. In fact, "silly" is too charitable a word to describe your abuse of terminology to support a clearly-refuted point.