4 ms·
Looks like the AG is considering that case seriously, they're asking a very extensive list of information, including information on how the decision to remove p
by ajnin 7y ago
Looks like the AG is considering that case seriously, they're asking a very extensive list of information, including information on how the decision to remove price caps was made, the names if individuals involved, and confidential details of the deal with Ethos Capital. They definitely already studied the case to ask the pertinent questions. Hopefully this is treated as seriously as it is for the Internet and any decision where corruption was involved, or that is detrimental to the interests of non-profits, is not allowed to go through.
- kevin_thibedeau 7y agoIt looks like this scheme is going to collapse now. The next important thing is to reinstate the price caps.
- zaphirplane 7y agoWhat i would like to understand is what’s California jurisdiction is
- dylz 7y agoICANN HQ is in Los Angeles, as a minimum
- lmkg 7y agoFrom the letter the AG sent: > *The Office of the Attorney General has the duty to supervise charitable organizations under [law#]. The [ICANN], as a registered nonprofit in California, is subject to regulation by the California Attorney General. Sort, IANAL answer: They are incorporated in California, making their corporate conduct subject to California's laws. Source: This PDF, starting on page 3. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/jeffrey-to-nevett-30jan20-en.pdf https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/jeffrey...