Your argument would be similar to the following. 1) Some people don't vaccinate because they have to eat first. 2) Because eating is more important than vacci

Your argument would be similar to the following. 1) Some people don't vaccinate because they have to eat first. 2) Because eating is more important than vaccinations, it would be inhumane to make vaccinations mandatory. 3) Ergo, you cannot make vaccinations mandatory until you solve world hunger. At that point why do anything at all? Decision paralysis makes things impossible to solve because this arbitrary person I made up doesn't have time for anything so you have to solve this completely irrelevant issue in order to free up time first so that they can then get to the point of order.