2 ms·
As regards #3, I agree: the more eyes who see this unconfirmed claim, the better. That's the main reason I upvoted the OP. A great outcome would be if reputabl
by cs702 7y ago
As regards #3, I agree: the more eyes who see this unconfirmed claim, the better. That's the main reason I upvoted the OP.
A great outcome would be if reputable scientists see this on HN or Twitter or learn about it through colleagues, and subsequently refute it or dismiss it as bad science.
- im3w1l 7y ago> the more eyes who see this unconfirmed claim, the better. Isn't it a waste of those eyes' time if it turns out to be false? When there are plenty of confirmed things they could be reading?